<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Intersection of IA and KM</title>
	<atom:link href="http://asist2006.neasist.org/2005/10/28/the-intersection-of-ia-and-km/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://asist2006.neasist.org/2005/10/28/the-intersection-of-ia-and-km/</link>
	<description>Conference Blog for the ASIST 2006 Annual Meeting</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 00:06:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Glenda Claborne</title>
		<link>http://asist2006.neasist.org/2005/10/28/the-intersection-of-ia-and-km/#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenda Claborne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2005 17:48:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asist2005.neasist.org/?p=32#comment-56</guid>
		<description>Abe, can you please comment further on your metaphor of 'desalination'? Or can any of the panelists please comment?

I can imagine that even a well-designed IA in the limited sense of a taxonomy or ontology will become another nice thing to have without it being integrated well into the work practices of people in an organization. A taxonomy or an ontology should be considered as a cost until it actually generates value in how users use it. That's why the panel emphasized capturing contexts into taxnomies and interpreting these well on the interface. But I believe it is impossible to account for all contexts within the constraints of the language of technology. We still have to nurture a culture of use surrounding that technology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Abe, can you please comment further on your metaphor of &#8216;desalination&#8217;? Or can any of the panelists please comment?</p>
<p>I can imagine that even a well-designed IA in the limited sense of a taxonomy or ontology will become another nice thing to have without it being integrated well into the work practices of people in an organization. A taxonomy or an ontology should be considered as a cost until it actually generates value in how users use it. That&#8217;s why the panel emphasized capturing contexts into taxnomies and interpreting these well on the interface. But I believe it is impossible to account for all contexts within the constraints of the language of technology. We still have to nurture a culture of use surrounding that technology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelly Green</title>
		<link>http://asist2006.neasist.org/2005/10/28/the-intersection-of-ia-and-km/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly Green</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2005 04:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asist2005.neasist.org/?p=32#comment-52</guid>
		<description>Sorry to have missed out on ICKM this year. I remember thinking that this particular panel looks interesting. Can you expand more on Abe's suggestion of "desalination"?
I find as the metadata architect and keeper of the 'digital library' at our organization, my tasks involve a great deal of IA work.  I have been getting into usability and interface issues which drarw upon the info. access and info retrieval aspects of my library backgrouond. However, the tecnology  are tools. KM is also a LOT about people and coordination...trying to get ppl active and maintain that energy is the hardest part  of KM in my experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry to have missed out on ICKM this year. I remember thinking that this particular panel looks interesting. Can you expand more on Abe&#8217;s suggestion of &#8220;desalination&#8221;?<br />
I find as the metadata architect and keeper of the &#8216;digital library&#8217; at our organization, my tasks involve a great deal of IA work.  I have been getting into usability and interface issues which drarw upon the info. access and info retrieval aspects of my library backgrouond. However, the tecnology  are tools. KM is also a LOT about people and coordination&#8230;trying to get ppl active and maintain that energy is the hardest part  of KM in my experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
